Be Prepared Watch and Listen Funny

v.three Improving Listening Competence

Learning Objectives

1. Identify strategies for improving listening competence at each stage of the listening process.
2. Summarize the characteristics of agile listening.
3. Apply critical-listening skills in interpersonal, educational, and mediated contexts.
4. Practice empathetic listening skills.
5. Discuss ways to improve listening competence in relational, professional person, and cultural contexts.

Many people admit that they could stand to better their listening skills. This department volition help us exercise that. In this section, nosotros will learn strategies for developing and improving competence at each stage of the listening process. We will as well ascertain agile listening and the behaviors that get forth with it. Looking back to the types of listening discussed earlier, nosotros will learn specific strategies for sharpening our critical and empathetic listening skills. In keeping with our focus on integrative learning, we will also utilize the skills nosotros have learned in academic, professional, and relational contexts and explore how civilisation and gender impact listening.

Listening Competence at Each Stage of the Listening Process

Nosotros can develop competence within each stage of the listening procedure, as the post-obit listing indicates (Ridge, 1993):

1. To improve listening at the receiving stage,
   • prepare yourself to listen,
   • discern between intentional messages and noise,
   • concentrate on stimuli most relevant to your listening purpose(south) or goal(s),
   • exist mindful of the choice and attention process as much as possible,
   • pay attention to turn-taking signals so you lot tin follow the conversational menses, and
   • avoid interrupting someone while they are speaking in social club to maintain your power to receive stimuli and listen.
2. To ameliorate listening at the interpreting phase,
   • place main points and supporting points;
   • use contextual clues from the person or environment to discern additional meaning;
   • be aware of how a relational, cultural, or situational context can influence meaning;
   • be enlightened of the different meanings of silence; and
   • note differences in tone of voice and other paralinguistic cues that influence significant.
3. To improve listening at the recalling stage,
   • use multiple sensory channels to decode messages and brand more complete memories;
   • repeat, rephrase, and reorganize information to fit your cerebral preferences; and
   • utilise mnemonic devices every bit a gimmick to help with recall.
4. To improve listening at the evaluating stage,
   • separate facts, inferences, and judgments;
   • be familiar with and able to place persuasive strategies and fallacies of reasoning;
   • assess the credibility of the speaker and the bulletin; and
   • be enlightened of your own biases and how your perceptual filters tin can create barriers to effective listening.
5. To improve listening at the responding stage,
   • ask appropriate clarifying and follow-up questions and paraphrase information to check understanding,
   • give feedback that is relevant to the speaker's purpose/motivation for speaking,
   • adapt your response to the speaker and the context, and
   • do non let the preparation and rehearsal of your response diminish earlier stages of listening.

Active Listening

Active listening refers to the process of pairing outwardly visible positive listening behaviors with positive cognitive listening practices. Active listening can aid address many of the environmental, physical, cerebral, and personal barriers to constructive listening that we discussed before. The behaviors associated with active listening tin also enhance advisory, critical, and empathetic listening.

Agile Listening Can Aid Overcome Barriers to Effective Listening

Existence an active listener starts earlier y'all actually start receiving a bulletin. Active listeners make strategic choices and take action in society to set up up ideal listening conditions. Physical and environmental noises tin can ofttimes be managed by moving locations or by manipulating the lighting, temperature, or article of furniture. When possible, avoid important listening activities during times of distracting psychological or physiological dissonance. For example, we oftentimes know when we're going to be hungry, full, more than awake, less awake, more anxious, or less anxious, and accelerate planning can alleviate the presence of these barriers. For college students, who oft have some flexibility in their class schedules, knowing when you all-time listen can help you brand strategic choices regarding what class to take when. And student options are increasing, as some colleges are offering classes in the overnight hours to accommodate working students and students who are just "night owls" (Toppo, 2011). Of course, we don't always accept control over our schedule, in which instance we volition need to use other effective listening strategies that we will learn more nearly later in this chapter.

In terms of cognitive barriers to effective listening, we can prime number ourselves to listen past analyzing a listening situation before information technology begins. For example, y'all could ask yourself the post-obit questions:

1. "What are my goals for listening to this message?"
2. "How does this message relate to me / affect my life?"
3. "What listening type and style are most advisable for this message?"

Equally nosotros learned earlier, the difference between speech and thought processing rate ways listeners' level of attention varies while receiving a message. Constructive listeners must work to maintain focus as much as possible and refocus when attention shifts or fades (Wolvin & Coakley, 1993). One way to practise this is to find the motivation to listen. If y'all can identify intrinsic and or extrinsic motivations for listening to a detail message, then you will be more likely to remember the information presented. Inquire yourself how a message could impact your life, your career, your intellect, or your relationships. This can help overcome our tendency toward selective attention. As senders of messages, we can help listeners by making the relevance of what nosotros're maxim clear and offer well-organized messages that are tailored for our listeners. We will learn much more than about establishing relevance, organizing a message, and gaining the attention of an audience in public speaking contexts later on in the volume.

Given that we can process more words per minute than people can speak, nosotros tin engage in internal dialogue, making good use of our intrapersonal communication, to become a better listener. Three possibilities for internal dialogue include covert coaching, self-reinforcement, and covert questioning; explanations and examples of each follow (Hargie, 2011):

• Covert coaching involves sending yourself messages containing communication about meliorate listening, such as "You're getting distracted by things yous have to do subsequently work. Just focus on what your supervisor is saying now."
• Cocky-reinforcement involves sending yourself affirmative and positive messages: "You lot're being a expert active listener. This volition assist y'all do well on the next exam."
• Covert questioning involves asking yourself questions about the content in ways that focus your attention and reinforce the material: "What is the main idea from that PowerPoint slide?" "Why is he talking nigh his brother in front of our neighbors?"

Internal dialogue is a more structured way to engage in active listening, only we can use more full general approaches as well. I suggest that students occupy the "extra" channels in their listen with thoughts that are related to the chief message being received instead of thoughts that are unrelated. We tin utilise those channels to resort, rephrase, and echo what a speaker says. When we resort, we can help mentally repair disorganized messages. When we rephrase, nosotros can put messages into our own words in means that better fit our cognitive preferences. When we repeat, we can assistance letters transfer from short-term to long-term retentivity.

Other tools can assistance with concentration and memory. Mental bracketing refers to the process of intentionally separating out intrusive or irrelevant thoughts that may distract you from listening (McCornack, 2007). This requires that nosotros monitor our concentration and attention and be prepared to let thoughts that aren't related to a speaker's message pass through our minds without u.s.a. giving them much attention. Mnemonic devices are techniques that can aid in data recall (Hargie 2011). Starting in aboriginal Greece and Rome, educators used these devices to aid people think information. They work by imposing club and organization on information. Iii chief mnemonic devices are acronyms, rhymes, and visualization, and examples of each follow:

• Acronyms. HOMES—to help call back the Cracking Lakes (Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, and Superior).
• Rhyme. "Righty tighty, lefty loosey"—to remember which way about light bulbs, screws, and other coupling devices turn to brand them go in or out.
• Visualization. Imagine seeing a drinking glass of port wine (which is red) and the ruby-red navigation light on a boat to help remember that the red light on a gunkhole is ever on the port side, which will besides help you recall that the blue lite must be on the starboard side.

Active Listening Behaviors

From the suggestions discussed previously, you can encounter that we can set up for active listening in advance and engage in certain cerebral strategies to help us heed ameliorate. We also appoint in active listening behaviors as nosotros receive and procedure messages.

Eye contact is a central sign of active listening. Speakers unremarkably interpret a listener's eye contact as a betoken of considerateness. While a lack of eye contact may betoken inattentiveness, it tin also signal cerebral processing. When we wait away to process new information, we ordinarily do information technology unconsciously. Exist enlightened, nonetheless, that your conversational partner may interpret this as not listening. If yous really do demand to take a moment to call up about something, you could indicate that to the other person past maxim, "That'due south new information to me. Give me just a 2d to recollect through it." We already learned the role that back-channel cues play in listening. An occasional caput nod and "uh-huh" signal that you lot are paying attending. However, when nosotros give these cues as a form of "autopilot" listening, others can usually tell that nosotros are pseudo-listening, and whether they call u.s. on information technology or not, that impression could pb to negative judgments.

A more than direct way to bespeak active listening is to reference previous statements made by the speaker. Norms of politeness usually call on us to reference a past statement or connect to the speaker'due south current thought before starting a conversational plow. Being able to summarize what someone said to ensure that the topic has been satisfactorily covered and understood or existence able to segue in such a mode that validates what the previous speaker said helps regulate conversational period. Request probing questions is another style to direct signal listening and to keep a conversation going, since they encourage and invite a person to speak more. You can also ask questions that seek clarification and not just elaboration. Speakers should present circuitous data at a slower speaking rate than familiar information, merely many will not. Recollect that your nonverbal feedback can be useful for a speaker, as it signals that you are listening but also whether or non you empathise. If a speaker fails to read your nonverbal feedback, you may demand to follow up with verbal advice in the form of paraphrased messages and clarifying questions.

Every bit active listeners, we desire to be excited and engaged, but don't permit excitement manifest itself in interruptions. Being an active listener ways knowing when to maintain our role equally listener and resist the urge to take a conversational turn. Research shows that people with higher social condition are more likely to interrupt others, so keep this in mind and exist prepared for it if yous are speaking to a high-status person, or endeavour to resist it if you are the loftier-status person in an interaction (Hargie, 2011).

Adept notation-taking skills allow listeners to stay engaged with a message and help in recall of information.

Annotation-taking can also indicate active listening. Translating information through writing into our own cerebral structures and schemata allows us to better interpret and assimilate information. Of grade, note-taking isn't e'er a viable pick. Information technology would be fairly awkward to take notes during a first appointment or a casual exchange between new coworkers. Just in some situations where we wouldn't normally consider taking notes, a little awkwardness might be worth information technology for the sake of understanding and recalling the information. For example, many people don't think about taking notes when getting data from their doctor or banker. I really invite students to take notes during informal meetings because I recollect they sometimes don't think about it or don't retrieve it's appropriate. Simply many people would rather someone jot downwardly notes instead of having to respond to follow-up questions on information that was already clearly conveyed. To help facilitate your notation-taking, you might say something like "Practice y'all mind if I jot downwards some notes? This seems important."

In summary, active listening is exhibited through verbal and nonverbal cues, including steady heart contact with the speaker; smile; slightly raised eyebrows; upright posture; body position that is leaned in toward the speaker; nonverbal dorsum-aqueduct cues such equally caput nods; verbal dorsum-channel cues such as "OK," "mmhum," or "oh"; and a lack of distracting mannerisms similar doodling or fidgeting (Hargie, 2011).

"Getting Competent"

Listening in the Classroom

The following statistic illustrates the importance of listening in academic contexts: four hundred offset-year students were given a listening exam before they started classes. At the finish of that year, 49 pct of the students with depression scores were on academic probation, while only four percent of those who scored high were (Conaway, 1982). Listening effectively isn't something that just happens; it takes piece of work on the part of students and teachers. Ane of the nigh difficult challenges for teachers is eliciting practiced listening behaviors from their students, and the method of instruction teachers use affects how a educatee will listen and larn (Beall et al., 2008). Given that in that location are different learning styles, nosotros know that to be effective, teachers may take to find some way to appeal to each learning style. Although teachers oft make this attempt, information technology is besides not realistic or practical to think that this practice can be used all the time. Therefore, students should also think of ways they tin can improve their listening competence, considering listening is an active process that we tin can exert some control over. The following tips will help you listen more than effectively in the classroom:

• Be prepared to process challenging messages. You can use the internal dialogue strategy we discussed earlier to "mentally repair" messages that you receive to brand them more listenable (Rubin, 1993). For example, you lot might say, "Information technology seems similar we've moved on to a different primary signal now. See if you tin pull out the subpoints to help stay on track."
• Act like a good listener. While I'1000 not advocating that you lot engage in pseudo-listening, engaging in active listening behaviors tin help you listen better when you lot are having difficulty concentrating or finding motivation to mind. Brand eye contact with the instructor and requite advisable nonverbal feedback. Students often take notes simply when directed to past the instructor or when there is an explicit reason to do and so (east.chiliad., to recollect information for an exam or some other purpose). Since you never know what information you may want to call up afterward, take notes fifty-fifty when information technology's not required that you exercise so. Equally a caveat, however, do not try to transcribe everything your instructor says or includes on a PowerPoint, because you will likely miss information related to principal ideas that is more important than minor details. Instead, listen for master ideas.
• Figure out from where the instructor most oft speaks and sit close to that area. Being able to make middle contact with an instructor facilitates listening, increases rapport, allows students to do good more from immediacy behaviors, and minimizes distractions since the teacher is the chief stimulus within the educatee's field of vision.
• Figure out your preferred learning style and prefer listening strategies that complement information technology.
• Let your instructor know when you lot don't sympathize something. Instead of giving a quizzical wait that says "What?" or pretending you know what'south going on, let your instructor know when you don't sympathise something. Instead of request the instructor to but repeat something, ask her or him to rephrase it or provide an example. When y'all ask questions, enquire specific clarifying questions that request a definition, an explanation, or an elaboration.

1. What are some listening challenges that yous face in the classroom? What tin you practice to overcome them?
2. Take the Learning Styles Inventory survey at the following link to decide what your primary learning style is: http://www.personal.psu.edu/bxb11/LSI/LSI.htm. Do some inquiry to identify specific listening/studying strategies that work well for your learning style.

Becoming a Ameliorate Critical Listener

Critical listening involves evaluating the brownie, completeness, and worth of a speaker's message. Some listening scholars note that critical listening represents the deepest level of listening (Floyd, 1985). Critical listening is besides important in a republic that values free speech. The Us Constitution grants The states citizens the right to gratis speech, and many people duly protect that right for you and me. Since people can say merely well-nigh anything they want, we are surrounded by countless messages that vary tremendously in terms of their value, degree of ethics, accurateness, and quality. Therefore it falls on us to responsibly and critically evaluate the messages we receive. Some messages are produced by people who are intentionally misleading, ill informed, or motivated by the potential for personal gain, merely such letters can exist received every bit honest, credible, or donating even though they aren't. Being able to critically evaluate messages helps us have more control over and awareness of the influence such people may have on us. In order to critically evaluate messages, we must heighten our critical-listening skills.

Some critical-listening skills include distinguishing between facts and inferences, evaluating supporting evidence, discovering your ain biases, and listening beyond the message. Chapter iii "Verbal Communication" noted that function of being an ethical communicator is being accountable for what we say past distinguishing between facts and inferences (Hayakawa & Hayakawa, 1990). This is an ideal that is not always met in practice, then a critical listener should also make these distinctions, since the speaker may non. Since facts are widely agreed-on conclusions, they can be verified every bit such through some actress research. Take care in your enquiry to note the context from which the fact emerged, every bit speakers may take a statistic or quote out of context, distorting its meaning. Inferences are not as easy to evaluate, because they are based on unverifiable thoughts of a speaker or on speculation. Inferences are usually based at least partially on something that is known, and then information technology is possible to evaluate whether an inference was made carefully or not. In this sense, y'all may evaluate an inference based on several known facts as more credible than an inference based on one fact and more speculation. Asking a question like "What led you to think this?" is a skilful way to get information needed to evaluate the forcefulness of an inference.

Distinguishing among facts and inferences and evaluating the credibility of supporting material are critical-listening skills that too require good informational-listening skills. In more formal speaking situations, speakers may cite published or publicly available sources to support their messages. When speakers verbally cite their sources, you can use the credibility of the source to help evaluate the brownie of the speaker's bulletin. For case, a national newspaper would likely exist more apparent on a major national event than a tabloid magazine or an anonymous weblog. In regular interactions, people as well have sources for their information but are not every bit likely to note them within their bulletin. Asking questions like "Where'd yous hear that?" or "How exercise you know that?" can assist get information needed to brand critical evaluations. You can wait to Chapter 11 "Informative and Persuasive Speaking" to learn much more than virtually persuasive strategies and how to evaluate the strength of arguments.

Discovering your ain biases can help yous recognize when they interfere with your ability to fully procedure a message. Unfortunately, most people aren't asked to critically reflect on their identities and their perspectives unless they are in college, and even people who were once critically reflective in college or elsewhere may no longer be so. Biases are also difficult to find, because nosotros don't come across them as biases; we run across them as normal or "the way things are." Asking yourself "What led you lot to think this?" and "How practise you know that?" tin be a good starting time toward acknowledging your biases. Nosotros volition also learn more than about self-reflection and critical thinking in Chapter 8 "Civilisation and Communication".

Final, to be a meliorate critical listener, think beyond the message. A expert critical listener asks the following questions: What is existence said and what is non being said? In whose interests are these claims being made? Whose voices/ideas are included and excluded? These questions accept into account that speakers intentionally and unintentionally slant, edit, or twist letters to make them fit detail perspectives or for personal proceeds. Also enquire yourself questions like "What are the speaker's goals?" Y'all can also rephrase that question and straight it toward the speaker, asking them, "What is your goal in this interaction?" When you experience yourself nearing an evaluation or conclusion, pause and ask yourself what influenced you. Although we similar to think that we are most often persuaded through logical evidence and reasoning, we are susceptible to persuasive shortcuts that rely on the brownie or likability of a speaker or on our emotions rather than the strength of his or her evidence (Niggling & Cacioppo, 1984). So proceed a check on your emotional involvement to exist enlightened of how it may be influencing your evaluation. Also, be enlightened that how likable, bonny, or friendly you think a person is may likewise pb you to more than positively evaluate his or her messages.

Other Tips to Help Yous Become a Improve Critical Listener

• Ask questions to help get more information and increment your critical awareness when yous go answers similar "Because that'due south the way things are," "It's always been like that," "I don't know; I just don't like it," "Everyone believes that," or "Information technology's just natural/normal." These are not actually answers that are useful in your disquisitional evaluation and may be an indication that speakers don't actually know why they reached the conclusion they did or that they reached it without much critical thinking on their function.
• Be specially critical of speakers who set up "either/or" options, considering they artificially limit an issue or state of affairs to two options when there are ever more than. Also exist aware of people who overgeneralize, especially when those generalizations are based on stereotypical or prejudiced views. For example, the earth is non merely Republican or Democrat, male or female, pro-life or pro-choice, or Christian or atheist.
• Evaluate the speaker's bulletin instead of his or her appearance, personality, or other characteristics. Unless someone's advent, personality, or behavior is relevant to an interaction, direct your criticism to the message.
• Be aware that disquisitional evaluation isn't ever quick or easy. Sometimes yous may have to withhold judgment because your evaluation volition take more than time. Besides keep in heed your evaluation may not be final, and you should be open to critical reflection and possible revision later.
• Avoid heed reading, which is assuming you know what the other person is going to say or that you know why they reached the decision they did. This leads to jumping to conclusions, which shortcuts the critical evaluation process.

"Getting Critical"

Critical Listening and Political Spin

In merely the past 20 years, the rise of political fact checking occurred as a consequence of the increasingly sophisticated rhetoric of politicians and their representatives (Dobbs, 2012). Every bit political campaigns began to prefer communication strategies employed by advertisement agencies and public relations firms, their messages became more ambiguous, unclear, and sometimes outright misleading. While at that place are numerous political fact-checking sources now to which citizens can turn for an analysis of political messages, it is important that we are able to use our own disquisitional-listening skills to run into through some of the political spin that now characterizes politics in the United States.

Since we get near of our political messages through the media rather than direct from a politician, the media is a logical place to plough for guidance on fact checking. Unfortunately, the media is oftentimes manipulated by political advice strategies likewise (Dobbs, 2012). Sometimes media outlets transmit messages fifty-fifty though a disquisitional evaluation of the message shows that information technology lacks brownie, completeness, or worth. Journalists who appoint in political fact checking have been criticized for putting their subjective viewpoints into what is supposed to be objective news coverage. These journalists have fought back against what they call the norm of "false equivalence." Ane view of journalism sees the reporter as an objective conveyer of political messages. This could exist described equally the "Nosotros written report; you decide" brand of journalism. Other reporters see themselves as "truth seekers." In this sense, the journalists engage in some critical listening and evaluation on the part of the citizen, who may not have the time or ability to do so.

Michael Dobbs, who started the political fact-checking programme at the Washington Post, says, "Fairness is preserved not by treating all sides of an statement equally, but through an independent, open-minded approach to the bear witness" (Dobbs, 2012). He too notes that outright lies are much less common in politics than are exaggeration, spin, and insinuation. This fact puts much of political discourse into an ethical gray area that can be especially hard for fifty-fifty professional person fact checkers to evaluate. Instead of simple "true/imitation" categories, fact checkers like the Washington Post issue evaluations such as "Half true, generally true, one-half-flip, or total-flop" to political statements. Although nosotros all don't have the time and resources to fact check all the political statements we hear, it may be worth employing some of the strategies used by these professional fact checkers on problems that are very important to us or accept major implications for others. Some fact-checking resources include http://www.PolitiFact.com, http://www.factcheck.org, and http://world wide web.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker. The caution here for any critical listener is to be enlightened of our trend to gravitate toward messages with which we agree and avoid or automatically reject messages with which nosotros disagree. In brusque, it's often easier for united states of america to critically evaluate the messages of politicians with whom we disagree and uncritically accept messages from those with whom we agree. Exploring the fact-check websites higher up can aid betrayal ourselves to critical evaluation that nosotros might non otherwise encounter.

1. One school of thought in journalism says it's up to the reporters to convey information every bit it is presented and then upwards to the viewer/reader to evaluate the message. The other school of thought says that the reporter should investigate and evaluate claims made by those on all sides of an issue equally and share their findings with viewers/readers. Which approach do you retrieve is better and why?
2. In the lead-upwardly to the war in Iraq, journalists and news outlets did not critically evaluate claims from the Bush-league administration that in that location was clear evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Many now cite this equally an case of failed fact checking that had global repercussions. Visit one of the fact-checking resources mentioned previously to discover other examples of fact checking that exposed manipulated messages. To enhance your critical thinking, find ane example that critiques a viewpoint, pol, or political party that you typically agree with and one that you lot disagree with. Discuss what you learned from the examples you lot constitute.

Condign a Better Compassionate Listener

A prominent scholar of empathetic listening describes it this mode: "Empathetic listening is to be respectful of the dignity of others. Compassionate listening is a caring, a honey of the wisdom to exist constitute in others whoever they may be" (Bruneau, 1993). This quote conveys that empathetic listening is more than philosophical than the other types of listening. It requires that nosotros are open to subjectivity and that we engage in it because nosotros genuinely run into information technology as worthwhile.

Combining active and compassionate listening leads to active-empathetic listening. During agile-compassionate listening a listener becomes actively and emotionally involved in an interaction in such a mode that it is conscious on the part of the listener and perceived by the speaker (Bodie, 2011). To be a ameliorate empathetic listener, nosotros need to suspend or at least attempt to suppress our judgment of the other person or their message so we can fully attend to both. Paraphrasing is an important part of empathetic listening, because it helps us put the other person's words into our frame of feel without making it nearly us. In addition, speaking the words of someone else in our own way tin assistance evoke within u.s.a. the feelings that the other person felt while saying them (Bodie, 2011). Active-empathetic listening is more than echoing back verbal messages. We can also appoint in mirroring, which refers to a listener's replication of the nonverbal signals of a speaker (Bruneau, 1993). Therapists, for example, are frequently taught to prefer a posture and tone similar to their patients in club to build rapport and project empathy.

Empathetic listeners should non steal the spotlight from the speaker. Offer support without offering your ain story or communication.

Blondinrikard Froberg – Spotlight – CC By 2.0.

Paraphrasing and questioning are useful techniques for empathetic listening because they allow united states of america to respond to a speaker without taking "the floor," or the attending, away for long. Specifically, questions that ask for elaboration act every bit "verbal door openers," and inviting someone to speak more and so validating their speech through active listening cues tin can help a person experience "listened to" (Hargie, 2011). I've found that paraphrasing and request questions are also useful when we experience tempted to share our own stories and experiences rather than maintaining our listening role. These questions aren't intended to solicit more information, so we can guide or direct the speaker toward a specific course of action. Although it is easier for us to slip into an advisory mode—maxim things like "Well if I were you, I would…"—we accept to resist the temptation to requite unsolicited communication.

Compassionate listening can be worthwhile, just it too brings challenges. In terms of costs, empathetic listening tin can use up time and effort. Since this type of listening tin can't be contained inside a proscribed fourth dimension frame, it may be especially difficult for time-oriented listeners (Bruneau, 1993). Empathetic listening can as well be a test of our endurance, as its orientation toward and focus on supporting the other requires the processing and integration of much exact and nonverbal information. Because of this potential strain, it's important to know your limits equally an empathetic listener. While listening can be therapeutic, it is not appropriate for people without training and preparation to try to serve equally a therapist. Some people accept chronic issues that necessitate professional listening for the purposes of evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy. Lending an ear is different from diagnosing and treating. If you take a friend who is exhibiting signs of a more serious issue that needs attention, heed to the extent that you experience comfy and so exist prepared to provide referrals to other resources that have grooming to help. To confront these challenges, good empathetic listeners typically have a generally positive self-concept and self-esteem, are nonverbally sensitive and expressive, and are comfortable with embracing another person'due south subjectivity and refraining from likewise much analytic thought.

Becoming a Ameliorate Contextual Listener

Active, critical, and compassionate listening skills can be helpful in a variety of contexts. Understanding the part that listening plays in professional person, relational, cultural, and gendered contexts can assistance us more competently apply these skills. Whether we are listening to or evaluating messages from a supervisor, parent, or intercultural conversational partner, we have much to gain or lose based on our ability to apply listening skills and knowledge in various contexts.

Listening in Professional Contexts

Listening and organizational-communication scholars notation that listening is ane of the most neglected aspects of organizational-communication research (Flynn, Valikoski, & Grau, 2008). Aside from a lack of research, a written report as well found that business schools lack curriculum that includes educational activity and/or preparation in communication skills like listening in their master of business administration (MBA) programs (Alsop, 2002). This lack of a focus on listening persists, even though nosotros know that more effective listening skills have been shown to enhance sales functioning and that managers who exhibit good listening skills help create open advice climates that can lead to increased feelings of supportiveness, motivation, and productivity (Flynn, Valikoski, & Grau, 2008). Specifically, empathetic listening and active listening tin can play key roles in organizational communication. Managers are wise to enhance their compassionate listening skills, every bit being able to understand with employees contributes to a positive communication climate. Active listening among organizational members also promotes involvement and increases motivation, which leads to more cohesion and enhances the communication climate.

Organizational scholars have examined diverse communication climates specific to listening. Listening surroundings refers to characteristics and norms of an system and its members that contribute to expectations for and perceptions about listening (Brownell, 1993). Positive listening environments are perceived to be more employee centered, which tin meliorate chore satisfaction and cohesion. But how exercise we create such environments?

Positive listening environments are facilitated by the breaking down of barriers to concentration, the reduction of noise, the creation of a shared reality (through shared language, such equally similar jargon or a shared vision statement), intentional spaces that promote listening, official opportunities that promote listening, preparation in listening for all employees, and leaders who model good listening practices and praise others who are successful listeners (Brownell, 1993). Policies and practices that support listening must go hand in hand. After all, what does an "admissible" policy mean if it is not coupled with actions that demonstrate the sincerity of the policy?

"Getting Real"

Condign a "Listening Leader"

Dr. Rick Bommelje has popularized the concept of the "listening leader" (Listen-Passenger vehicle.com, 2012). As a listening coach, he offers training and resources to aid people in various career paths increment their listening competence. For people who are very committed to increasing their listening skills, the International Listening Association has now endorsed a program to become a Certified Listening Professional person (CLP), which entails advanced contained study, close work with a listening mentor, and the completion of a written exam.^[i] In that location are also training programs to help with empathetic listening that are offered through the Compassionate Listening Project.^[two] These programs bear witness the growing focus on the importance of listening in all professional person contexts.

Scholarly enquiry has consistently shown that listening ability is a key function of leadership in professional person contexts and competence in listening aids in decision making. A survey sent to hundreds of companies in the United states found that poor listening skills create problems at all levels of an organizational hierarchy, ranging from entry-level positions to CEOs (Hargie, 2011). Leaders such as managers, team coaches, department heads, and executives must be versatile in terms of listening blazon and style in order to adapt to the diverse listening needs of employees, clients/customers, colleagues, and other stakeholders.

Even if we don't have the time or money to invest in one of these professional person-listening training programs, nosotros tin draw inspiration from the goal of becoming a listening leader. By reading this book, you are already taking an important step toward improving a variety of advice competencies, including listening, and you can always take it upon yourself to further your written report and increase your skills in a item expanse to better set yourself to create positive communication climates and listening environments. Yous can also use these skills to make yourself a more desirable employee.

1. Make a list of the behaviors that yous think a listening leader would showroom. Which of these do you lot think you do well? Which do you lot demand to piece of work on?
2. What do you call back has contributed to the perceived shortage of listening skills in professional contexts?
3. Given your personal career goals, what listening skills practice you lot recall you will need to possess and employ in lodge to exist successful?

Listening in Relational Contexts

Listening plays a fundamental role in establishing and maintaining our relationships (Nelson-Jones, 2006). Without some listening competence, we wouldn't be able to engage in the self-disclosure process, which is essential for the institution of relationships. Newly acquainted people become to know each other through increasingly personal and reciprocal disclosures of personal information. In order to reciprocate a conversational partner'south disclosure, we must procedure it through listening. Once relationships are formed, listening to others provides a psychological reward, through the elementary act of recognition, that helps maintain our relationships. Listening to our relational partners and existence listened to in render is part of the give-and-have of whatever interpersonal human relationship. Our thoughts and experiences "dorsum up" inside of us, and getting them out helps us maintain a positive remainder (Nelson, Jones, 2006). And so something equally routine and seemingly pointless every bit listening to our romantic partner debrief the events of his or her twenty-four hour period or our roommate recount his or her weekend back home shows that we are taking an involvement in their lives and are willing to put our ain needs and concerns aside for a moment to attend to their needs. Listening also closely ties to conflict, as a lack of listening often plays a large role in creating conflict, while effective listening helps us resolve it.

Listening has relational implications throughout our lives, also. Parents who engage in competent listening behaviors with their children from a very immature historic period make their children feel worthwhile and appreciated, which affects their development in terms of personality and character (Nichols, 1995).

Parents who exhibit competent listening behaviors toward their children provide them with a sense of recognition and security that affects their future development.

A lack of listening leads to feelings of loneliness, which results in lower self-esteem and higher degrees of anxiety. In fact, by the age of four or five years old, the empathy and recognition shown by the presence or lack of listening has molded children'southward personalities in noticeable ways (Nichols, 1995). Children who have been listened to grow up expecting that others will be available and receptive to them. These children are therefore more likely to interact confidently with teachers, parents, and peers in ways that help develop communication competence that will be built on throughout their lives. Children who take non been listened to may come to await that others will non want to mind to them, which leads to a lack of opportunities to practise, develop, and hone foundational communication skills. Fortunately for the more-listened-to children and unfortunately for the less-listened-to children, these early experiences become predispositions that don't alter much equally the children go older and may actually reinforce themselves and become stronger.

Listening and Culture

Some cultures identify more than importance on listening than other cultures. In full general, collectivistic cultures tend to value listening more than individualistic cultures that are more speaker oriented. The value placed on verbal and nonverbal meaning also varies past culture and influences how nosotros communicate and mind. A low-context advice style is one in which much of the meaning generated within an interaction comes from the verbal communication used rather than nonverbal or contextual cues. Conversely, much of the meaning generated past a high-context communication style comes from nonverbal and contextual cues (Lustig & Koester, 2006). For example, US Americans of European descent generally employ a low-context communication style, while people in East Asian and Latin American cultures use a high-context advice manner.

Contextual communication styles touch listening in many ways. Cultures with a loftier-context orientation generally use less verbal communication and value silence as a class of advice, which requires listeners to pay shut attention to nonverbal signals and consider contextual influences on a message. Cultures with a low-context orientation must use more verbal advice and provide explicit details, since listeners aren't expected to derive pregnant from the context. Annotation that people from low-context cultures may feel frustrated by the ambiguity of speakers from high-context cultures, while speakers from high-context cultures may feel overwhelmed or even insulted by the level of detail used by low-context communicators. Cultures with a depression-context communication style also tend to have a monochronic orientation toward time, while high-context cultures have a polychronic fourth dimension orientation, which also affects listening.

As Affiliate 8 "Civilization and Communication" discusses, cultures that favor a structured and commodified orientation toward time are said to exist monochronic, while cultures that favor a more flexible orientation are polychronic. Monochronic cultures like the U.s.a. value time and action-oriented listening styles, especially in professional person contexts, because time is seen as a commodity that is deficient and must exist managed (McCorncack, 2007). This is evidenced by leaders in businesses and organizations who frequently request "executive summaries" that simply focus on the virtually relevant information and who employ statements like "Get to the point." Polychronic cultures value people and content-oriented listening styles, which makes sense when we consider that polychronic cultures besides tend to be more than collectivistic and use a loftier-context communication style. In collectivistic cultures, indirect communication is preferred in cases where direct advice would be considered a threat to the other person's face (desired public image). For example, flatly turning downward a business offer would be too directly, so a person might reply with a "maybe" instead of a "no." The person making the proposal, however, would be able to draw on contextual clues that they implicitly learned through socialization to interpret the "maybe" as a "no."

Listening and Gender

Research on gender and listening has produced mixed results. As we've already learned, much of the research on gender differences and communication has been influenced past gender stereotypes and falsely connected to biological differences. More recent inquiry has found that people communicate in means that conform to gender stereotypes in some situations and non in others, which shows that our communication is more influenced past societal expectations than past innate or gendered "difficult-wiring." For example, through socialization, men are generally discouraged from expressing emotions in public. A woman sharing an emotional feel with a human may perceive the man's lack of emotional reaction equally a sign of inattentiveness, particularly if he typically shows more emotion during private interactions. The man, nevertheless, may be listening but withholding nonverbal expressiveness because of social norms. He may not realize that withholding those expressions could be seen as a lack of empathetic or active listening. Researchers also dispelled the belief that men interrupt more than women exercise, finding that men and women interrupt each other with similar frequency in cantankerous-gender encounters (Dindia, 1987). Then men may interrupt each other more in aforementioned-gender interactions equally a witting or subconscious attempt to establish dominance considering such behaviors are expected, as men are more often than not socialized to exist more than competitive than women. Nevertheless, this type of competitive interrupting isn't as present in cantankerous-gender interactions because the contexts have shifted.

Key Takeaways

• You tin ameliorate listening competence at the receiving stage by preparing yourself to listen and distinguishing between intentional messages and noise; at the interpreting stage past identifying main points and supporting points and taking multiple contexts into consideration; at the recalling stage past creating memories using multiple senses and repeating, rephrasing, and reorganizing messages to fit cognitive preferences; at the evaluating stage by separating facts from inferences and assessing the credibility of the speaker'due south message; and at the responding stage past request appropriate questions, offer paraphrased messages, and adapting your response to the speaker and the state of affairs.
• Agile listening is the procedure of pairing outwardly visible positive listening behaviors with positive cerebral listening practices and is characterized by mentally preparing yourself to listen, working to maintain focus on concentration, using appropriate verbal and nonverbal back-channel cues to signal attentiveness, and engaging in strategies similar note taking and mentally reorganizing information to help with recall.
• In order to employ critical-listening skills in multiple contexts, we must be able to distinguish between facts and inferences, evaluate a speaker'southward supporting evidence, observe our own biases, and remember beyond the bulletin.
• In order to do compassionate listening skills, we must exist able to support others' subjective experience; temporarily set aside our own needs to focus on the other person; encourage elaboration through active listening and questioning; avoid the temptation to tell our own stories and/or give advice; effectively mirror the nonverbal communication of others; and admit our limits as empathetic listeners.

• Getting integrated: Different listening strategies may need to be applied in different listening contexts.

  • In professional contexts, listening is considered a necessary skill, simply most people do not receive explicit pedagogy in listening. Members of an organization should consciously create a listening environment that promotes and rewards competent listening behaviors.
  • In relational contexts, listening plays a cardinal role in initiating relationships, equally listening is required for mutual self-disclosure, and in maintaining relationships, as listening to our relational partners provides a psychological reward in the grade of recognition. When people aren't or don't feel listened to, they may experience feelings of isolation or loneliness that can accept negative effects throughout their lives.
  • In cultural contexts, high- or low-context communication styles, monochronic or polychronic orientations toward fourth dimension, and individualistic or collectivistic cultural values touch listening preferences and behaviors.
  • Research regarding listening preferences and behaviors of men and women has been contradictory. While some differences in listening exist, many of them are based more than on societal expectations for how men and women should listen rather than biological differences.

Exercises

1. Go on a "listening log" for part of your day. Notation times when you feel like you exhibited competent listening behaviors and note times when listening became challenging. Analyze the log based on what you accept learned in this section. Which positive listening skills helped you mind? What strategies could you utilise to your listening challenges to improve your listening competence?
2. Utilize the strategies for effective disquisitional listening to a political message (a search for "political spoken communication" or "partisan speech" on YouTube should provide yous with many options). As yous analyze the speech, make sure to distinguish between facts and inferences, evaluate a speaker's supporting evidence, discuss how your ain biases may influence your evaluation, and call back beyond the message.
3. Discuss and analyze the listening environs of a place you have worked or an organization with which you lot were involved. Overall, was it positive or negative? What were the norms and expectations for effective listening that contributed to the listening environment? Who helped gear up the tone for the listening environs?

References

Alsop, R., Wall Street Journal-Eastern Edition 240, no. 49 (2002): R4.

Beall, G. 50., et al., "State of the Context: Listening in Didactics," The International Journal of Listening 22 (2008): 124.

Bodie, G. D., "The Agile-Empathetic Listening Scale (AELS): Conceptualization and Evidence of Validity inside the Interpersonal Domain," Communication Quarterly 59, no. iii (2011): 278.

Brownell, J., "Listening Environs: A Perspective," in Perspectives on Listening, eds. Andrew D. Wolvin and Carolyn Gwynn Coakley (Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation, 1993), 243.

Bruneau, T., "Empathy and Listening," in Perspectives on Listening, eds. Andrew D. Wolvin and Carolyn Gwynn Coakley (Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation, 1993), 194.

Conaway, M. Southward., "Listening: Learning Tool and Retentiveness Agent," in Improving Reading and Study Skills, eds. Anne S. Algier and Keith W. Algier (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1982).

Dindia, K., "The Effect of Sex of Subject and Sex of Partner on Interruptions," Human being Communication Inquiry 13, no. 3 (1987): 345–71.

Dobbs, M., "The Rise of Political Fact-Checking," New America Foundation (2012): 1.

Floyd, J. J.,Listening, a Applied Approach (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1985), 39–40.

Flynn, J., Tuula-Riitta Valikoski, and Jennie Grau, "Listening in the Business Context: Reviewing the State of Research," The International Journal of Listening 22 (2008): 143.

Hargie, O., Skilled Interpersonal Interaction: Research, Theory, and Practice (London: Routledge, 2011), 193.

Hayakawa, South. I. and Alan R. Hayakawa, Linguistic communication in Thought and Action, 5th ed. (San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace, 1990), 22–32.

Listen-Coach.com, Dr. Rick Listen-Coach, accessed July thirteen, 2012, http://world wide web.mind-coach.com.

Lustig, One thousand. W. and Jolene Koester, Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Advice beyond Cultures, 5th ed. (Boston, MA: Pearson Didactics, 2006), 110–xiv.

McCornack, S., Reflect and Relate: An Introduction to Interpersonal Communication (Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin'south, 2007), 192.

Nelson-Jones, R., Human Human relationship Skills, fourth ed. (East Sussex: Routledge, 2006), 37–38.

Nichols, Thou. P., The Lost Art of Listening (New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1995), 25.

Picayune, R. E. and John T. Cacioppo, "The Furnishings of Interest on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion," Periodical of Personality and Social Psychology 46, no. 1 (1984): 69–81.

Ridge, A., "A Perspective of Listening Skills," in Perspectives on Listening, eds. Andrew D. Wolvin and Carolyn Gwynn Coakley (Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation, 1993), 5–6.

Rubin, D. L., "Listenability = Oral-Based Discourse + Considerateness," in Perspectives on Listening, eds. Andrew D. Wolvin and Carolyn Gwynn Coakley (Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation, 1993), 277.

Toppo, G., "Colleges Start Offering 'Midnight Classes' for Offbeat Needs," USA Today, October 27, 2011, accessed July xiii, 2012, http://www.usatoday.com/news/pedagogy/story/2011–10–26/college-midnight-classes/50937996/1.

Wolvin, A. D. and Carolyn Gwynn Coakley, "A Listening Taxonomy," in Perspectives on Listening, eds. Andrew D. Wolvin and Carolyn Gwynn Coakley (Norwood, NJ: Alex Publishing Corporation, 1993), nineteen.

---

dolphlestathe.blogspot.com

Source: https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/5-3-improving-listening-competence/

Share this post